shapinglight: (boss of the evils)
None ([personal profile] shapinglight) wrote2017-12-05 02:32 pm

Lucifer season 3 episode 9

Nice to see Lucifer back, even if it is only for two weeks.

This episode was very much a first part of something.

Spoilers behind cut.



It also, IMO, increased exponentially the possibility that Lt Pierce is the real villain of the season. I didn't say anything before when people were speculating Pierce himself would turn out to be the Sinnerman because I knew who had been cast in the role, but now the Sinnerman has revealed himself (allegedly) I'm beginning to think they're right.

This is because the Sinnerman's actions in this episode make no sense, especially in light of the build-up that the fake kidnapper from episode one - not to mention Pierce himself- gave him in earlier episodes. He was made out to be this terrifying criminal mastermind, and though it's perfectly possible for such a person to look like a retired history teacher (that's how he came across to me), it doesn't seem likely that they'd do all their own dirty work. Surely they'd have minions to do the actual killings. So, is the Sinnerman working for someone else?

Probably.

Either that, or, despite the self-mutilation (ick!) he's actually rather stupid. Okay, so Lucifer walked into his trap, but if he really was such a mastermind he would have made sure of Maze too. He also wouldn't have walked right into the subsequent trap set for him by Chloe and Charlotte.

Maybe he wanted to be caught?

Pierce actually being the villain would also make sense of Pierce telling Lucifer in episode 2 to keep Chloe out of the whole Sinnerman thing because she has a kid, only to come striding in in this episode to back up Lucifer's insistence that the Sinnerman is not an urban myth but real, thus dragging Chloe into the case. What's changed since episode 2? Well, for one thing, Pierce has found out that Chloe's is 'special.'

So either he's the villain and he needs her for something, or he's exactly what he seems and he's falling in love with her.

With this show, it could be either, or both. I just wish the whole thing didn't depend on Tom Welling. I just don't like him. I don't think he can act, and I don't find him attractive. This means that every time Chloe acts all coy/confused around him, or looks at him in a 'damn, that man is fine!' kind of way, I cringe. I also can't decide whether Welling is fat or not. He looks fat to me, but it could be pure muscle and he's just built, as we say in Britland, like a brick s**thouse. Either way, he has no neck, and the only person I'll excuse that in is Channing Tatum.

Don't get me wrong. I don't require men I find attractive to be perfectly toned. I just like them to have a bit of charisma - like the guy who played the con man in Mr & Mrs Mazikeen Smith. Welling just doesn't have any.

Oh well, as I've said before, as long as Welling being in the show helps it not get cancelled, I'll just have to grit my teeth and hope he doesn't stick around more than one season.

Other stuff: well, firstly it's great that Maze is really and truly back. I'm pretty sure this episode was filmed only about six weeks after Lesley-Ann Brandt had her baby. She looks absolutely amazing. It works for me that Maze is jealous about Linda having another 'friend'- much more interesting than her being jealous of Amenadiel having a new love interest. Sad, though, that the only way she could get Lucifer to listen to her was to lock him up again. I'd hoped he might do better this season. And what do we call the new 'ship? Amenda? Lindiel?

Tricia Helfer is still knocking it out of the park as Charlotte, but I have to say, I miss Mum. She was a way better character.

Been trying to remember if there are any blinded characters in the Lucifer comics, and the only one I can think of is Lucifer's fellow fallen angel, Meleos, who Lucifer blinds to stop him creating any more monsters like the Basanos. So, no real parallels.

Speaking of the comics, I read the last volume of the new Lucifer series from Vertigo the other day. Unfortunately, it was rather a disappointment. The original writer was gone, and the new writer just seemed to want to tie things up in an uncharacteristically neat bow. There were a few good moments, but I felt a bit let down, have to say.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting