Telly stuff - reviews etc
Jan. 15th, 2013 02:43 pmHello again. A very quick post about telly stuff, which includes mention of several shows, such as Ripper Street, Utopia (which, no, I haven't watched), Homeland and JM's guest spot in The Wedding Band.
No real spoilers for any of them.
Re: Homeland, I agree entirely with this reaction in today's Guardian to the show winning best TV drama at the Golden Globes. Homeland is a pile of racist s**t. I'm just glad the plot has now got so preposterous that it's unlikely people will take it seriously for much longer.
I didn't like this Sunday's ep of Ripper Street as much as the first two. Torture scenes are a big turn off for me (and I'm sure I'm not the only one), especially when torture is shown as being effective. See that Guardian article again. I will still keep watching the show, though.
The first episode of Channel 4's new genre drama series Utopia is on tonight. I would probably have watched this if it weren't for every critic and article I've seen about it so far mentioning the very graphic torture scene in ep 1. Shall probably give it a miss.
Finally, I just watched the episode of The Wedding Band with JM guest starring (as a (mostly) washed up old rock star). I wasn't really expecting to, but I enjoyed it enormously. JM was great (the character was pretty much Spike-as-a-rock-star, but still..), and I quite liked the other characters too. The only teeth-grittingly awful false note was the other Brit character (really a Brit, I think) guessing that JM's character was a Scouser and being told he'd guessed right. The Beatles (remember them?) were Scousers. Does JM-doing-a-Brit-accent sound like the Beatles? No, he does not.
The stuff with the awful little dog was hilarious, though.
No real spoilers for any of them.
Re: Homeland, I agree entirely with this reaction in today's Guardian to the show winning best TV drama at the Golden Globes. Homeland is a pile of racist s**t. I'm just glad the plot has now got so preposterous that it's unlikely people will take it seriously for much longer.
I didn't like this Sunday's ep of Ripper Street as much as the first two. Torture scenes are a big turn off for me (and I'm sure I'm not the only one), especially when torture is shown as being effective. See that Guardian article again. I will still keep watching the show, though.
The first episode of Channel 4's new genre drama series Utopia is on tonight. I would probably have watched this if it weren't for every critic and article I've seen about it so far mentioning the very graphic torture scene in ep 1. Shall probably give it a miss.
Finally, I just watched the episode of The Wedding Band with JM guest starring (as a (mostly) washed up old rock star). I wasn't really expecting to, but I enjoyed it enormously. JM was great (the character was pretty much Spike-as-a-rock-star, but still..), and I quite liked the other characters too. The only teeth-grittingly awful false note was the other Brit character (really a Brit, I think) guessing that JM's character was a Scouser and being told he'd guessed right. The Beatles (remember them?) were Scousers. Does JM-doing-a-Brit-accent sound like the Beatles? No, he does not.
The stuff with the awful little dog was hilarious, though.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-15 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-15 04:24 pm (UTC)(Also stupid academy! Benedict Cumberbatch should win something!)
no subject
Date: 2013-01-15 04:48 pm (UTC)I would be much happier if Homeland had ended with him being shot at the end of the last but one episode of S2. The whole final episode felt so gratuitous and tacked on so they could spin it out for another season. However I have to disagree with the Guardian (and so I guess with you) I found it a very nuanced show. Completely unbelievable and presumably unrealistic, but still nuanced and intricately plotted. And FWIW I think asking 'why do they hate us?' is a perfectly legitimate question and better asked than not. Surely it's a step up from 'they do it because they are all evil'.
I've got Utopia set to record. I'll fast forward through any torture if need be, and let you know if it's worth catching up on.
Any opinions on World Without End? The book is less violent than the first one, but it still has it's moments and if they go too graphic with the plague I may give it a miss.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-15 05:04 pm (UTC)Hmmm, so many people have told me that I should check out Homeland, but I tried watching one episode and couldn't really see the appeal (as much as I like Damien Lewis and Clare Danes).
no subject
Date: 2013-01-15 05:11 pm (UTC)Very interesting article about Hollywood and Islamaphobia, and some insightful comments. Wish we could all be more open-minded.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:21 pm (UTC)Yes, that took me by surprise actually. I didn't know the character was meant to be British.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:24 pm (UTC)As for Homeland, you may see it differently. Lots of people do, obviously.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:30 pm (UTC)It's not worse. It's mostly off screen, but it's the fact that it's effective that I hate. There's too much of that about in TV/films at the moment, and I've had too many torture!Yay! arguments with annoying people on the internet.
Surely it's a step up from 'they do it because they are all evil'.
IMO, that's pretty much what the show is saying anyway. Plus pandering to already existing paranoia and painting a completely false picture of al-Quaida and how it works, which ramps the paranoia up even further.
Haven't seen World Without End and didn't watch whatever it's a sequel of so can't comment. As for Utopia, just reading a description of the scene in question made me feel sick this morning. I'm going to give it a miss.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:44 pm (UTC)It always astonishes me how many people can get to adulthood without having thought through issues like torture, the death penalty, abortion etc. They then wander around expounding their half-baked morality and working it out in public - usually very slowly and rudely - and generally annoying the populace. Surely one of the few advantages of locking teenagers up together in schools for their formative years is it gives them time to work all this stuff out where they can't annoy other people while they do it?
no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 01:59 pm (UTC)The rest of it is probably interesting enough, but this scene goes on for four whole minutes, apparently. I just don't see how that can be justified. Actually, I think I might complain to Channel 4, though I'm always reluctant to complain when I haven't watched/read the thing I want to complain about.
It always astonishes me how many people can get to adulthood without having thought through issues like torture, the death penalty, abortion etc. They then wander around expounding their half-baked morality and working it out in public - usually very slowly and rudely.
Most of the people I've had rows with have had very definite views in actual fact. I've just found them horrific and indefensible.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-16 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 03:28 pm (UTC)Have to admit, even reading a description of the scene made my stomach churn. I'm funny about eyes too.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-17 09:54 pm (UTC)The whole thing seemed like it was trying to do saturated hyper-realism, but just seemed too detached and cold to manage it successfully.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-02 06:27 pm (UTC)I've already forgotten the name of the gay brothel! What was it again?
The part about the excavation of The London Underground in a recent episode annoyed me because the District Line was already up and running in Whitechapel at that time! And it wasn't electric until 1905!!
no subject
Date: 2013-02-04 03:30 pm (UTC)The gay brothel was referred to as a 'molly house.' That's what they were called in the 18th century, but I don't think that was still the case in the 1880s.
The leg shaving didn't bother me, probably because I've no clue whether it's anachronistic or not.