Buffy season 10 no 17
Jul. 22nd, 2015 01:13 pmSpoilers behind cut. I enjoyed it, btw.
Mind you, it's not any better than previous issues - obvious writing, very talky, etc, etc. I still enjoyed it, though.
Rather a lot of anvil-y conversations, including one where Willow - based on her experience with Aluwyn - tells Angel that mortal/immortal relationships rarely work because mortals change all the time and immortals don't. When Angel protests that Spike is immortal too, Willow says Spike hasn't had his soul back for long and that was a very big change.
This seems to imply that eventually Spike will reach some sort of steady state where he won't change and therefore won't be a suitable partner for Buffy any more.
Or something. Who knows?
The anvil-y Willow/Angel conversation also features an attempt by Angel to claim that he's changed a lot from how he was in 1922 (a year chosen arbitrarily by Willow, I think), only to go on to describe what he used to be like and realise he's still exactly the same.
Elsewhere, Buffy snaps at Spike then has a rather puzzling conversation with Andrew. Not sure that I get what that's about. Something about seizing the moment, I think. Also, Spike clearly still doesn't believe that Buffy loves him, and why would he, given what happened in seasons 8 & 9? And of course she still hasn't said so.
The issue ends with Angel getting possessed by Archaeus and running Spike through with a sword. Mind you, he's owed Spike a running through with a sword since AHitW in AtS season 5. This one is less funny, though.
Can't really guess how this arc is going to end relationship-wise, but from the spoilery blurb for the first issue of A&F after the crossover, Angel will be taking Archaeus back to Magic Town with him somehow or other (maybe as an unwitting passenger in his head, though I would imagine that he will appear to be back to himself by the end of the next issue). Not sure what Spike's ongoing doubts mean either. Or whether Willow's comments about mortal/immortal relationships just not working is a sign of things to come (it probably is - though if Spike is to move on toMrs Marsters Dylan, surely the same thing would apply to her?).
Still can't guess how this is going to end. Bored with Archaeus, though. I'll be glad when he f**ks off to A&F (which is already boring). Lets get back to Ghost!Anya.
Mind you, it's not any better than previous issues - obvious writing, very talky, etc, etc. I still enjoyed it, though.
Rather a lot of anvil-y conversations, including one where Willow - based on her experience with Aluwyn - tells Angel that mortal/immortal relationships rarely work because mortals change all the time and immortals don't. When Angel protests that Spike is immortal too, Willow says Spike hasn't had his soul back for long and that was a very big change.
This seems to imply that eventually Spike will reach some sort of steady state where he won't change and therefore won't be a suitable partner for Buffy any more.
Or something. Who knows?
The anvil-y Willow/Angel conversation also features an attempt by Angel to claim that he's changed a lot from how he was in 1922 (a year chosen arbitrarily by Willow, I think), only to go on to describe what he used to be like and realise he's still exactly the same.
Elsewhere, Buffy snaps at Spike then has a rather puzzling conversation with Andrew. Not sure that I get what that's about. Something about seizing the moment, I think. Also, Spike clearly still doesn't believe that Buffy loves him, and why would he, given what happened in seasons 8 & 9? And of course she still hasn't said so.
The issue ends with Angel getting possessed by Archaeus and running Spike through with a sword. Mind you, he's owed Spike a running through with a sword since AHitW in AtS season 5. This one is less funny, though.
Can't really guess how this arc is going to end relationship-wise, but from the spoilery blurb for the first issue of A&F after the crossover, Angel will be taking Archaeus back to Magic Town with him somehow or other (maybe as an unwitting passenger in his head, though I would imagine that he will appear to be back to himself by the end of the next issue). Not sure what Spike's ongoing doubts mean either. Or whether Willow's comments about mortal/immortal relationships just not working is a sign of things to come (it probably is - though if Spike is to move on to
Still can't guess how this is going to end. Bored with Archaeus, though. I'll be glad when he f**ks off to A&F (which is already boring). Lets get back to Ghost!Anya.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-22 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-22 01:47 pm (UTC)I thought that too the first time I read it. The second time I wasn't so sure. Spike obviously thinks she's having doubts, though.
See... it was all meant to confuse us and mislead us in what direction they are actually going.
Yes, probably.
To be honest, I don't mind all the talking that much. In this form of literature (if you can call it that), I prefer it. I'd rather know what people are thinking.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-22 04:39 pm (UTC)And lol no Angel never really changes (albeit that's a story tack that doesn't work well for the character of Spike who constantly evolved on the show).
no subject
Date: 2015-07-22 05:55 pm (UTC)And yeah. The key point isn't that Spike got his soul more recently than Angel did. It's that Spike got a soul deliberately. He voluntarily made a huge change, and could conceivably do so again, whereas Angel has had his big choices forced upon him.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-22 06:05 pm (UTC)I think so too, which is sort of sad, but plausible.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-22 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 12:57 am (UTC)- Spike can't come up with any significant differences between himself and Angel? What freakin' bizarro world did I wake up in?!
- Dawn's and Andrew's reactions to Angel are weird!
- Willow is so wrong about vampires not changing. I can't think of anybody who has changed more than Spike. Still, it does seem to be a negative foreshadowing :-(
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 10:11 am (UTC)Spike being an unchanging immortal? Not so much.
I also am very ready to find out what's the deal with ghost!Anya.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 01:24 pm (UTC)Since it happened, I can't remember any of the characters mentioning this except Spike himself, and when he does, he's always written like a complete jerk, even though it happens to be true.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 01:25 pm (UTC)Begin to feel? I've felt that right from the start, if only because this comic has Joss's name on it.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 01:26 pm (UTC)Mrs MarstersDylan at Spike as a sort of consolation prize, the same applies to her.no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 01:29 pm (UTC)I felt that speech of his went off in an odd direction. Spike started off comparing him and Buffy to Buffy and Angel, then suddenly he's making direct comparisons with himself and Angel. I don't get it either.
- Dawn's and Andrew's reactions to Angel are weird!
Dawn's certainly was. I'm not saying she should have been all standoffish with him, but the hugging was somewhat OTT, I thought.
- Willow is so wrong about vampires not changing. I can't think of anybody who has changed more than Spike. Still, it does seem to be a negative foreshadowing :-(
Yeah, it does. ;)
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 01:33 pm (UTC)He doesn't, does he, though I understand there are many who think he was being wonderful and heroic, and, unlike Spike, showing he cares more about Buffy than his own happiness.
Which may be true, but I'm not surprised Xander looked completely gobsmacked to hear that Angel had interfered with Connor's memories (and with Buffy's, though Angel failed to mention that).
I did appreciate his "I'll guard the rear" moment when he realised that, no, in many ways he hadn't changed that much since 1922.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 01:43 pm (UTC)(albeit that's a story tack that doesn't work well for the character of Spike who constantly evolved on the show).
Yeah, I sort of get the impression from the story that we the reader are supposed to view Spike and Angel as both being essentially the same. It doesn't work with the show, but that hasn't stopped them before.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 01:49 pm (UTC)Yeah, it doesn't really work. I've seen the claim re-surface over this issue that Spike just wants to be Angel, but I've never thought that was the case. At least, it was never that simple.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 01:53 pm (UTC)Finally read it. It's not bad, but you kinda have to ignore everything before mid-S10 for a lot of the talk not to make you 'huh?' Nothing out of Dawn's mouth makes sense, either to Angel or Spike. All Andrew does is repeat the same thing she said to him 5 issues ago.
Also this UV-Ray weapon stuff needs to stop.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 02:01 pm (UTC)At first I thought it could just be a joke. They've played it before with the different coloring line in Dirty Girls.
Given the context, though, I think it's supposed to mirror Angel's realization that he hasn't changed.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 03:42 pm (UTC)I haven't ever spoken to her myself (have seen her) but she seems very nice, and she's been very good for James.
I'd like to think Dylan won't turn up again, but someone asked Gage about it on Twitter and he said she would. So who knows?
I agree James's story was badly positioned with regard to canon. Doesn't fit at all into BtVS season 7. I doubt Joss didn't change the timeline because he doesn't like James (though I don't think he has much time for him). More like he didn't bother reading it, or has forgotten continuity himself.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 03:46 pm (UTC)It might be that Spike's sudden wobble is as much to do with thinking he's no good for Buffy any more than Angel is than being upset because he thinks she still loves Angel.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 03:48 pm (UTC)I agree. They pay lip service to what happened in season 8 but it feels like they're just ticking boxes to me. They don't really want to deal with it.
Also this UV-Ray weapon stuff needs to stop.
It is pretty annoying. I quite like the banana phones, though. Were they in the show? I don't remember.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 04:23 pm (UTC)About Gage's twitter remark concerning Dylan. Hmm, I guess she will, then. That sucks.
About Jasmin. Well, obviously I don't know her but I have had plenty of small facebook and twitter/instagram interactions with her and she just behaves as if she is down to earth, has a great sense of humor and self irony and I value those trademarks very much. And she is sort of humble, too. At one point she contacted me privately on facebook thanking me for defending her after a particular vicious remark/attack on her on facebook profile. If they ever divorce, he is the one missing out (which I think he is very much aware of). But that's it for her. I still don't really care for Dylan. :)
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:09 pm (UTC)I quite like the banana phones, though.
I have to say, I don't get the joke. I thought it was supposed to be some kind of turn on Apple, which is what Andrew uses.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:12 pm (UTC)And no, I don't believe we ever saw those on the show. Frankly, I don't see Warren permitting such a thing.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:20 pm (UTC)Yeah, I think that's how it reads too on Spike's part.
It's the Dawn part that doesn't make sense to me 'cause there's nothing there to show Buffy's second-guessing so much as being annoyed at Spike's ranting. Of course, I get the impression from Willow's conversation, too. Both she and Dawn start off with the same 'don't take it personally' line, so...I don't know. As usual, upon further analysis, it doesn't make much sense.
Could be intentional to keep the reader wondering WTF until the final issue.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:24 pm (UTC)has forgotten continuity himself.
Who could forget him 'forgetting' Warren was dead, was played by the First and was a major part of S7.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:43 pm (UTC)It'll probably end up being more like neither.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:47 pm (UTC)That was nice of her. She's had to put up with a lot. Some of the things said about her that I've heard of have been really vicious, and pretty racist too.
I don't care for Dylan either, and nice as Jasmin may be, and sweet as it is in a way, I still find James writing his wife into the story a little bit icky. ;)
I could cope with it, though, when I thought that was just a one-off non-canonical story. Bringing Dylan into season 10 really annoyed me. I didn't want that story 'canonised' in any way because, as you say, it just doesn't fit.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:51 pm (UTC)You're right, though. It doesn't seem like Warren's style.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 06:02 pm (UTC)Not to mention being able to hit people. It makes no sense whatsoever to place it there.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-23 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-07-24 01:06 pm (UTC)James's story was a perfectly nice little non-canon story. If they'd left it that way I wouldn't have a problem. But then
Mrs MarstersDylan showed up in season 10.no subject
Date: 2015-07-24 01:07 pm (UTC)And it's not nearly as mad (plus, better art) than season 8.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-24 01:12 pm (UTC)Dawn was completely OOC too, I don't think her fake memories have her spending enough time to develop a crush on Angel.. On top of her teenage Xander and Spike crushes...
Just no.
I did like the fact that Buffy didn't want to spend that much time with Angel, she seemed to be the only one who remember twilight.
no subject
Date: 2015-07-24 05:37 pm (UTC)I agree Dawn's reaction is OTT. I can imagine her being friendly to Angel just fine, but the hugging is a little too much.