(no subject)
Jul. 28th, 2009 08:04 amBrian Lynch posted covers to upcoming Angel books, with a teaser cover for the ongoing Spike series, at his blog. Very tiny casting spoilers, I suppose, though nothing you couldn't guess at if you've read Spike: Asylum.
The books look fun. I'm sort of looking forward to this Angel and Spike visit the SDCC story, even though it takes the fourth wall breakage of Spike: Shadow Puppets that bit further. However, such things aren't unusual in comics (can remember various Marvel 'novelty' issues where characters would start fights in the Marvel writers' 'bullpen,' etc etc).
Apparently, the Spike ongoing series will not debut until 2010, and looking at that last image, I found myself thinking, who does IDW think will buy it? I can't talk for the larger comics buying public, of course, (though in my experience, an enormous number of them wouldn't be seen dead buying a film/TV tie-in), and maybe there are thousands of Spike fans out there, who enjoyed Lynch's take on the character and want more of it. However, since I only know about the online part of the Buffyverse comics-buying fandom (very far from the whole fandom even in online terms), I'm left wondering.
The more vociferous comics-reading section of the fandom, as seen regurgitating rubbish with depressing frequency on Buffyforums, aren't going to buy it. They may pretend to have, but in reality, if they read it, they will probably only read a download, because basically they loathe Spike and want to believe everyone else does and want the comic to fail. And, where the online Spike fans are concerned, an awful lot of them don't read the comics at all, or if they did, disliked some of the things Lynch did with Spike so much (all the uncharacteristic running away for the sake of humour, plus the Spider and the Hugh Hefner mansion set-up in A: AtF) that they may not buy it either. Then there're all the canon snobs on Whedonesque, who aren't interested in the comics unless they're 'canon', which, thankfully, nothing at IDW post-A: AtF has any pretence to be. So they're not going to read it either (plus, plenty of Spike-haters on Whedonesque too).
I enjoyed Lynch's solo Spike stories enough to keep on reading for the moment. It'll depend what he does with the character as to how long I continue, but like I said, apart from me, who is going to be reading?
I'd put up a poll but have to rush off to work in a minute and don't have time.
One thing - if the reason you're not going to buy the comic is because you really, really loathe Spike, don't feel you need to come and tell me so.
The books look fun. I'm sort of looking forward to this Angel and Spike visit the SDCC story, even though it takes the fourth wall breakage of Spike: Shadow Puppets that bit further. However, such things aren't unusual in comics (can remember various Marvel 'novelty' issues where characters would start fights in the Marvel writers' 'bullpen,' etc etc).
Apparently, the Spike ongoing series will not debut until 2010, and looking at that last image, I found myself thinking, who does IDW think will buy it? I can't talk for the larger comics buying public, of course, (though in my experience, an enormous number of them wouldn't be seen dead buying a film/TV tie-in), and maybe there are thousands of Spike fans out there, who enjoyed Lynch's take on the character and want more of it. However, since I only know about the online part of the Buffyverse comics-buying fandom (very far from the whole fandom even in online terms), I'm left wondering.
The more vociferous comics-reading section of the fandom, as seen regurgitating rubbish with depressing frequency on Buffyforums, aren't going to buy it. They may pretend to have, but in reality, if they read it, they will probably only read a download, because basically they loathe Spike and want to believe everyone else does and want the comic to fail. And, where the online Spike fans are concerned, an awful lot of them don't read the comics at all, or if they did, disliked some of the things Lynch did with Spike so much (all the uncharacteristic running away for the sake of humour, plus the Spider and the Hugh Hefner mansion set-up in A: AtF) that they may not buy it either. Then there're all the canon snobs on Whedonesque, who aren't interested in the comics unless they're 'canon', which, thankfully, nothing at IDW post-A: AtF has any pretence to be. So they're not going to read it either (plus, plenty of Spike-haters on Whedonesque too).
I enjoyed Lynch's solo Spike stories enough to keep on reading for the moment. It'll depend what he does with the character as to how long I continue, but like I said, apart from me, who is going to be reading?
I'd put up a poll but have to rush off to work in a minute and don't have time.
One thing - if the reason you're not going to buy the comic is because you really, really loathe Spike, don't feel you need to come and tell me so.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 09:11 am (UTC)Faith fans, perhaps? Or come to think of it, IDW probably don't have the rights, so I'm guessing that's someone else?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 09:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 09:56 am (UTC)Otherwise, I probably won't bother.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 09:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 10:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 10:44 am (UTC)Well, I suppose IDW are hoping that the fans who enjoyed the previous Spike solo series will want to read this one.
As I said, I do. I'm okay with most of what he did with the character in the solo series. It was in A: AtF where I disliked things, where Spike's character was rather different (some might say regressed) to contrast him with Angel, which to be fair to Lynch happened in season 5 of AtS too.
Mind you, the fact that this book doesn't have even the pretence of being canon is a big plus in my book. It means I can take it or leave it, and I'm reasonably sure, judging by past experience that I'll enjoy it.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 10:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 11:11 am (UTC)*wishes we could see more of Tok*
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 11:19 am (UTC)I think you'll get your wish. Lynch strikes me as a Spike/Tok 'shipper.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 02:03 pm (UTC)I'm actually glad it isn't. Nothing worse than being told you have to consider something's canon when you really dislike it (talking about the Buffy comic here).
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 02:03 pm (UTC)I feel the same, though I hope Lynch buries Spider. Never want to see that character again.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 02:57 pm (UTC)For all that many people claim they hate Spike ratings jumped from 3.8/5 (s04e22) to 4.4/7 (s05e01) when he became attached to a show.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 03:57 pm (UTC)The third one probably is probably indicative of the theme that'll be explored in the story : Spike's identity or how does he defines himself in regard to Angel. I'm very ambivalent about this idea, it could be interesting but at the same time it feels (to me anyway) like it's something that doesn't stem up naturally from Spike's story.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:10 pm (UTC)I'll probably wait on your reports about the comics. I also enjoyed the solo efforts, so it's not impossible that I'd like them...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:53 pm (UTC)The covers look cool. Of Lynch's solo Spike stuff, I've only read Asylum - I meant to get Shadow Puppets, but then season 8 sucked all the joy out of comics for me. But I did enjoy Asylum, so I really should read SP, and then possibly the new one.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 06:01 pm (UTC)However, such things aren't unusual in comics (can remember various Marvel 'novelty' issues where characters would start fights in the Marvel writers' 'bullpen,' etc etc).
Lynch's tendency to break the wall is a small part of what bothers me about his writing the stories. He tends to go a bit too far for a joke, sacrificing drama for humor. The one example coming to mind that bothered me from After the Fall was the Senior Partners talking in, essentially, Lynch's voice. And again, the Spike taking the elevator down to Fred/Illyria in First Night.
That being said, his stories are very entertaining and I loved Spike: After the Fall and really enjoyed Asylum, so I'll probably be buying. I just wish that Lynch was better at masking his voice a bit more and that he wouldn't negatively undercut dramatic moments with humor sometimes (Become What You Are had a nice balance though). The key timing seems to be to use humor to undercut the drama when it's getting a bit too high brow and serious, to self-mock. It doesn't always work for Lynch, I think.
I also loathe Spike. No really. I do! ...really.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 08:46 pm (UTC)While it wouldn't altogether surprise me, I do hope not. Hi, Maggie. Nice to see you. And it'll be a while before I make any reports on the Spike comic, as it's not due out until next year.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 08:56 pm (UTC)The first one is the weakest altogether, I think, but Mooney and Runge do good covers on the whole. The third cover isn't anything to do with the Spike book, but instead part of a comic two-parter Brian Lynch is writing about Spike and Angel visiting the San Diego Comics Convention where supposedly a blockbuster is to be premiered that's been made about Angel's adventures in Hell, in which Angel has been transformed into Nic Cage and Spike is a busty blonde. That sort of film.
It'll probably be very funny with lots of 4th wall breakage, and at some point people's identities will get confused and Spike will think he's Angel, hence the split face on the cover.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 08:59 pm (UTC)You came all the way here to tell me that?
Shadow Puppets is good fun. I'm sure you'll enjoy it. I think the new series will be fun too, but I do hope that Lynch won't make the mistake of making the supporting cast all OCs. The AtS cast characters have been split up so much already, and it was always an ensemble show.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 09:06 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure there'll be romance of some sort in the comic, probably with Lynch's OC Tok Shinobu. I could cope with that, or with Illyria. It's only Spider I couldn't cope with because I loathed that Playboy Mansion scenario so much.
Re: Tok. I even have an idea in my head that Comics Spike and Comics Buffy might meet up one day and Spike would say, "My new girlfriend's Japanese," and Buffy would say, "So's mine." :)
The key timing seems to be to use humor to undercut the drama when it's getting a bit too high brow and serious, to self-mock. It doesn't always work for Lynch, I think.
I agree that it doesn't always work - the elevator scene you mention is one I particularly dislike - but I think it's Jossian in spirit.
I also loathe Spike. No really. I do! ...really.
People keep saying that - and after I told them not to as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 01:30 am (UTC)I dunno... Asylum's supporting cast was all OCs, and that wasn't bad. And SP just has Spike and Lorne, right? So he can write a good cast of OCs, he just didn't for some reason in ATF. I would prefer to see more interaction with the AtS characters, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-29 03:16 am (UTC)But you have a point about the sales. All the canon junkies won't be interested, a lot of Spike fans don't like comics period, I hope it does well but I don't know. A lot of Bangels seemed to be clamoring for Spike to get his own comic, so they would never have to see him again, and I guess they got their way.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-03 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-03 04:50 pm (UTC)Not quite. Lorne was in it too, though briefly. However, I think his contribution gave it the right balance between show characters and OCs. If the regular cast of the comic (and Lynch says it will be small) turns out to feature no other show characters at all, I shall be very disappointed.
So he can write a good cast of OCs, he just didn't for some reason in ATF.
I still don't really get what he thought he was doing with that dreadful Spider character. For thing's for sure, though, he'd forgotten, or failed to understand in the first place, that a lot of Spike fans are women.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-03 04:53 pm (UTC)It's true that Franco Urru does draw him very, very pretty.
A lot of Bangels seemed to be clamoring for Spike to get his own comic, so they would never have to see him again, and I guess they got their way.
It looks that way, yes, though I suppose the fact this comic isn't 'canon' rather takes the shine off it.