Yet Another Buffy/Angel comics poll
Nov. 5th, 2010 06:17 pmYesterday, I read the latest issues of the Buffy and Angel comics. Have to say it was a bit of a strange experience, reading two such wildly different portrayals of Angel in one day. One of them, if a little idealised (not that much, though), was very recognisable to me as Angel of AtS seasons 1-4 (Angel of AtS season 5 is a bit different). The other seems to have fast-forwarded through his own life and skipped straight from Graduation Day Part 2 in BtVS season three to where he is now without passing go (except for a very brief halt in End of Days).
Then, I suddenly realised why they were so different. Of course! I told myself, how stupid of me not to think of it before. It's so obvious. Angel left Sunnydale at the end of BtVS season 3 and bumped into that Toth guy from The Replacement, who zapped him with his magic stick thing-y. There are in fact two of him. One of them went off to L.A. and grew up (or sort of), the other got locked away in a box somewhere, to be taken out during End of Days just to snog Buffy and sulk, and then be bundled away again until season 8. This one is obviously a gullible idiot wandering around like Fotherington-Thomas going, "Hullo clouds, hullo sky, hullo talking dog!" and not thinking anything of it when they answer back.
Well, it makes as much sense to me as anything else.
Under the cut, a poll. Choose your own wacky cause to the effect of Bizarro Angel
[Poll #1641102]
Then, I suddenly realised why they were so different. Of course! I told myself, how stupid of me not to think of it before. It's so obvious. Angel left Sunnydale at the end of BtVS season 3 and bumped into that Toth guy from The Replacement, who zapped him with his magic stick thing-y. There are in fact two of him. One of them went off to L.A. and grew up (or sort of), the other got locked away in a box somewhere, to be taken out during End of Days just to snog Buffy and sulk, and then be bundled away again until season 8. This one is obviously a gullible idiot wandering around like Fotherington-Thomas going, "Hullo clouds, hullo sky, hullo talking dog!" and not thinking anything of it when they answer back.
Well, it makes as much sense to me as anything else.
Under the cut, a poll. Choose your own wacky cause to the effect of Bizarro Angel
[Poll #1641102]
no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 06:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:13 pm (UTC)They may well be better off missing. I don't think Joss is interested in any of them, except maybe Illyria.
And now see, season 8 Angel would never wear that crash helmet.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 07:13 pm (UTC)Also, Joss hasn't watched Ats in awhile, has forgotten all about Connor and has decided that Angel: After the Fall isn't canon after all.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 07:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:15 pm (UTC)Yeah, I did say AtS season 5 Angel is a little different. However, he also became a horrible cynic who signed away the Shanshu prophecy, so I don't see him listening to any talking dogs.
No other explanation. There are two of him.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 07:48 pm (UTC)This keeps making me giggle. So does your poll. For which I thank you, because I've been feeling very grumpy about all this lately.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:19 pm (UTC)Jeanty saying that Angel and Spike just hate each other was sort of the last straw for me, must admit. Then I read the latest Angel comic which, while not being that great a comic, at least gave me an Angel I could respect, plus gave him a great scene with Spike (and they didn't just hate each other) and a great scene with Connor.
His son. Who he loves more than anything.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 07:54 pm (UTC)...perhaps causing him to do unthinkable things to Spike which the vampires are politely not mentioning. Yeah. Something like that. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 09:14 pm (UTC)He's thin at one end, much thicker in the middle and thin again at the far end.
Much like the comic, in other words.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:22 pm (UTC)Almost, but not quite. :)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 11:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-06 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-06 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-06 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-06 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-06 08:21 pm (UTC)Nah. In "End of Days," Angel was all jokily sulky about the Spike thing, and Angel s3 wouldn't have done that.
Or, maybe he would. The only time Buffy and Angel didn't have a melodramatic moment while talking to each other was when the subject was about Spike...otherwise, Angel's pretty two dimensional around Buffy unless he's Angelus.
I think Joss has decided to pretend as if the Angelverse doesn't exist. A good deal of it was Greenwalt's baby and not Joss. He really didn't want to focus on making folks identify with vamps (though he repeatedly did it inadvertently), and certainly didn't want a spinoff. Perhaps this is his way of saying "up yours!" Then again, IMO, he's doing the same with Buffy, so...
no subject
Date: 2010-11-06 08:22 pm (UTC)In fact I'd argue that the folks who try to justify this comic!Angel as being in character as completely misunderstanding his true canon persona. Like srsly.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-07 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-07 07:50 pm (UTC)